Best Two-Step Prop Firms (2026)
The industry standard evaluation model. Compare the best two-step prop firms with static drawdowns and high leverage.
Top Ranked Best Two-Step Prop Firms
Our two-step prop firm scores are based on pricing transparency, drawdown rules, payout conditions, platform support, company history and trader feedback. Data was last verified in August 2026.
| Rank | Firm | Trust Score | Markets | Challenge Fee | Profit Split | Max Funding | Platform | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | FTMOEst. 2015 | 9.8/10 | ForexIndicesCryptoCommodities | $155 | Up to 90% | 200K | MT4MT5+1 | |
| #2 | The 5%ersEst. 2016 | 9.6/10 | ForexIndicesMetalsCrypto | $95 | Up to 100% | 250K | MT5 | |
| #3 | Crypto Fund TraderEst. 2023 | 9.4/10 | ForexCryptoIndicesCommoditiesStocks | $58 | Up to 80% | 200K | MT5cTrader | |
| #4 | MUBITEEst. 2024 | 9.4/10 | Crypto | $65 | Up to 90% | 200K | Mubite WebTraderTradingView | |
| #5 | Funding PipsEst. 2022 | 9.2/10 | ForexIndicesMetalsCrypto | $32 | Up to 95% | 200K | MT5cTrader+1 | |
| #6 | Alpha Capital GroupEst. 2021 | 9.2/10 | ForexIndicesCommodities | $50 | Up to 80% | 200K | MT5cTrader+2 | |
| #7 | City Traders ImperiumEst. 2018 | 9.2/10 | ForexIndicesCommoditiesCrypto | $29 | Up to 100% | 100K | MT5Match-Trader | |
| #8 | Blue GuardianEst. 2021 | 9.0/10 | FuturesForexCryptoIndices | $54 | Up to 100% | 150K | MT5Match-Trader+5 | |
| #9 | The Trading PitEst. 2022 | 9.0/10 | FuturesForexStocks | $99 | Up to 80% | 200K | NinjaTraderTradovate+2 | |
| #10 | HyroTraderEst. 2023 | 9.0/10 | Crypto | $56 | Up to 90% | 200K | Bybit APICustom Platform | |
| #11 | TopTier TraderEst. 2021 | 8.9/10 | FuturesForexCFDsCrypto | $55 | Up to 90% | 200K | Match-Trader | |
| #12 | Goat Funded TraderEst. 2023 | 8.8/10 | ForexFutures | $54 | Up to 100% | 400K | MT4cTrader+1 | |
| #13 | FunderProEst. 2023 | 8.7/10 | ForexIndicesCryptoStocks | $69 | Up to 90% | 200K | MT5cTrader+1 | |
| #14 | Maven TradingEst. 2022 | 8.6/10 | Forex | $12 | Up to 90% | 100K | MetaTrader | |
| #15 | BitFundedEst. 2023 | 8.4/10 | Crypto | $50 | Up to 80% | 200K | Custom Platform | |
| #16 | ThinkCapitalEst. 2023 | 8.4/10 | ForexCryptoIndicesCommodities | $90 | Up to 90% | 100K | DXtradecTrader |
Why These Firms?
Top 5 ranked prop firms evaluated by PCH methodologyFTMO
★ 9.8 / 10 TrustBest for industry-leading reliability, global reputation and high profit splits
FTMO is widely considered the gold standard in the prop trading industry. Founded in 2015, they have paid out tens of millions to worldwide traders, supporting versatile crypto pairings with incredible platform execution speeds.
The 5%ers
★ 9.6 / 10 TrustBest for instant funding and aggressive scaling plans
The 5%ers is a premier, highly trusted firm famous for its unique instant funding accounts and the Bootcamp scaling model. Founded in 2016, they focus heavily on nurturing long-term professional portfolio managers.
Crypto Fund Trader
★ 9.4 / 10 TrustBest for 24/7 weekend crypto prop trading
Crypto Fund Trader is the global champion for crypto prop trading, offering unprecedented leverage and assets lists.
MUBITE
★ 9.4 / 10 TrustBest for traders seeking a reliable evaluation and solid payout conditions
MUBITE is a specialized cryptocurrency prop trading firm offering 2-Step, 1-Step, and Instant Funding programs up to $200,000. Features on-demand payouts within 24 hours, profit splits up to 90%, leverage up to 100x, and full weekend holding for digital asset traders.
Funding Pips
★ 9.2 / 10 TrustBest for low evaluation fees and fast biweekly payouts
Funding Pips has exploded in popularity among modern day-traders because of its ultra-low fee structure and 0-day minimum trading requirement. It offers excellent modern platforms like Match Trader and cTrader.
Detailed Specifications Comparison
| Firm | Trust Score | Pricing | Max Split | Max Funding | Platforms | Markets | Drawdown Type | Daily Stop |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | $155 | Up to 90% | 200K | MT4, MT5, cTrader | Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 9.6 | $95 | Up to 100% | 250K | MT5 | Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto | Equity-based | 3% | |
| 9.4 | $58 | Up to 80% | 200K | MT5, cTrader | Forex, Crypto, Indices, Commodities, Stocks | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 9.4 | $65 | Up to 90% | 200K | Mubite WebTrader, TradingView | Crypto | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 9.2 | $32 | Up to 95% | 200K | MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader | Forex, Indices, Metals, Crypto | Equity-based | 5% | |
| 9.2 | $50 | Up to 80% | 200K | MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Alpha Trader | Forex, Indices, Commodities | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 9.2 | $29 | Up to 100% | 100K | MT5, Match-Trader | Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Balance-based (Static) | 4% | |
| 9.0 | $54 | Up to 100% | 150K | MT5, Match-Trader, NinjaTrader, TradeLocker, TradingView, Tradovate, DeepCharts | Futures, Forex, Crypto, Indices | Balance-based | 4% | |
| 9.0 | $99 | Up to 80% | 200K | NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, Sierra Chart | Futures, Forex, Stocks | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 9.0 | $56 | Up to 90% | 200K | Bybit API, Custom Platform | Crypto | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 8.9 | $55 | Up to 90% | 200K | Match-Trader | Futures, Forex, CFDs, Crypto | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 8.8 | $54 | Up to 100% | 400K | MT4, cTrader, Match-Trader | Forex, Futures | Equity-based | 5% | |
| 8.7 | $69 | Up to 90% | 200K | MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker | Forex, Indices, Crypto, Stocks | Balance-based (Static) | 5% | |
| 8.6 | $12 | Up to 90% | 100K | MetaTrader | Forex | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 8.4 | $50 | Up to 80% | 200K | Custom Platform | Crypto | Balance-based | 5% | |
| 8.4 | $90 | Up to 90% | 100K | DXtrade, cTrader | Forex, Crypto, Indices, Commodities | Equity-based | 4% |
Why two-step challenges are the industry standard
Two-step evaluations are the most common model. Phase 1 typically requires an 8% profit target, while Phase 2 requires 5% to prove consistency. The main advantage is that 2-step accounts usually offer static, balance-based drawdowns rather than trailing drawdowns, providing a safer environment for swing traders.